SAVE HARE HATCH SHEEPLANDS

What is wrong with governments/local authorities these days. Reading through the previous planning applications it seems to me that WBC have in the past actually approved some of the changes.   It is more beneficial to allow this business to flourish and maintain the jobs already there than to close it down, put people on benefits and leave an unsightly weed covered area of land which no doubt it will revert to. Of course it could be that WBC want it on which to build some of their quota of new homes regardless of whether it is green belt or otherwise. It seems to me that 'greenbelt' is only 'greenbelt' if developers haven't yet offered enough money for it.  In my opinion the whole procedure should be looked at again by a different team of planners especially as they don't seem to be able to get their facts right,  documentation correct and are including planning for completely separate applications form other organizations nothing to do with Sheeplands.

#295: -