UCONN COVID-19 BOOSTER MANDATE
URGENT NOTICE TO UCONN ADMINISTRATION AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
We are a group of UCONN stakeholders: parents, students, families, faculty, staff, alumni, families of prospective students, and others within the UCONN Community writing this urgent letter of concern to you, in consultation with expert clinicians, to request a time critical modification to UCONN's COVID-19 booster vaccine mandate.
We fully understand and empathize with the difficult position the UCONN administration finds itself in during this pandemic. Nevertheless, we have very serious safety concerns about the recent vaccine booster mandate at UCONN.
It’s clear that the University's administration has not exercised sufficient circumspection in creating clearly delineated medically rational “off-ramps” from the booster mandates for those who are already well immune to COVID-19.
It is a serious problem that a medically unnecessary third booster shot could prove dangerous and irreparably harmful in such already well immune individuals.
Therefore, with this letter, we are respectfully requesting that UCONN administration formally exempt the following four groups of students, faculty, and staff from a vaccine booster mandate:
- Individuals who, within the span of the past 12-24 months, have had a natural COVID-19 infection AND two mandated mRNA vaccine shots (OR the single shot J&J vaccine). These individuals are by clinical definition, very robustly immune. In fact, Dr. Anthony Fauci has labeled such persons, “bullet proof” with “hybrid immunity”. To vaccinate such already well immune persons with an added booster by administrative mandate is medically unnecessary and, thus, only risks serious harm – possibly irreparably to some.
- Individuals who had already received the prior mandated vaccinations, and who during this Christmas break experienced a “breakthrough infection” with the Delta or Omicron Variants. Like individuals in the first category above, COVID-19 immunity in these persons also meets the definition of “bullet proof hybrid immunity”. Additionally, to vaccinate such very recently infected/convalescent persons with a medically unnecessary booster vaccine carries a risk of triggering a dangerous hyperinflammatory response. This should be avoided at all costs.
- Individuals whose second dose of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was less than 6 months ago. As you know, according to current FDA guidance, boosters are approved only for persons who underwent vaccination at least 5 months prior to boost. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-expands-eligibility-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-booster-dose-16-and-174)
- Individuals, vaccinated or previously infected, in whom a licensed physician has ordered a personalized serological evaluation and attests that robust and protective COVID-19 immunity is already present.
We know that your intent in imposing a booster vaccine mandate at UCONN is to protect the community. However, in the rush to protect UCONN, we ask that you not lose sight of rational ethical reasoning - or of the very important principle of medical necessity.
It is a vastly accepted truism that harm and irreparable damage to innocents in the minority, almost always resides in “one-size-fits-all” approaches to institutional and governmental policies and practices.
We would like to call your attention to more than 140 published scientific articles regarding C19 vaccine adverse events related to children and young adults. This letter will serve as notice that UCONN Administrators and Board of Trustees are in possession of these articles and fully aware of these risks documented by the scientific community: https://www.rwmalonemd.com/references
With this letter of petition, we ask that UCONN urgently shift its booster mandate policy to automatically exempt the large proportion of our community who fall within the above four categories.
We also request that ALL UCONN C19 mandate language be changed from "requires" to "recommends" and “required” to “recommended” to allow the UCONN community the medical freedom to make individual medical decisions about drugs that are empirically and irrefutably demonstrated to be ineffective at “protecting others.”
With credit to: Hooman Noorchashm MD, PhD
- Bachelor of Arts, University of Pennsylvania, School of Arts and Sciences (Biology/Chemistry)
- Graduate Degree, University of Pennsylvania, Biomedical Graduate Studies (Immunology)
- Doctor of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine (Medicine)
- Intern in General Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Resident in General Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania,
- Resident in Cardiothoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston,
- Physician, Immunologist, Public Health Advocate
Thank you,
DIVERSE GROUP OF UCONN STUDENTS, FAMILIES, STAFF, FACULTY, ALUMNI, PROSPECTIVE FAMILIES AND BROADER UCONN COMMUNITY Contact the author of the petition
DIVERSE GROUP OF UCONN STUDENTS, FAMILIES, STAFF, FACULTY, ALUMNI, PROSPECTIVE FAMILIES AND BROADER S COMMUNITY Contact the author of the petition