North Coates Flying Club

Contact the author of the petition

This discussion topic has been automatically created of petition North Coates Flying Club.

Charlie

#101 North Coates

2014-07-18 22:37

Wind farms cost more than they produce ,out at sea if you must ,stop destroying peoples hobbies and lively hood

Guest

#102

2014-07-19 07:01

I learned to fly at this airfield and along with its history it would be crime for it to cease to function, especially has there are alternative sites for the wind farm.

Guest

#103

2014-07-19 08:44

Vital to aviation to retain airfields which are under increasing pressure .

Guest

#104

2014-07-19 13:14

I am a big supporter of renewable energy, but not in locations like North Coates where they jeopardise existing businesses and operations.

Guest

#105

2014-07-19 13:21

If there's an alternative less dangerous site why choose this one?

Guest

#106

2014-07-20 14:52

This is happening too regular (airfields being under threat for one reason or another)

Guest

#107

2014-07-20 17:34

Light aviation is a valuable part of our economy, providing jobs and income. There can be no justification for threatening a viable airfield for the sake of investors' convenience. There are clear alternatives for the siting of the development.

Guest

#108

2014-07-21 11:04

Windfarms are great; if they're or at sea or somwhere with no impact ... but have no place near an active Airfield ... thats just asking for trouble

Guest

#109

2014-07-21 11:31

I lost my airfield due to the crazy government inspector agreeing to the planning consent for 4 Turbines which the local council had turned down.We would have had the 4 of the largest in the country at 130.5 mtrs they would have affected our Paramotor training and put my students in a dangerous situation. but the inspector thought differently and granted the planning the whole process is a farce over £32000 in legal fees raised by local villages and in the end came down to one man.
Good Luck hope you win
Geoff Soden Paramotors UK

Guest

#110

2014-07-21 21:22

Electricity from windfarms is unreliable and cannot be stored. Wind is an intermittent and unpredictable energy source; it can provide neither the base-load nor the load-following power required by the Grid. It is beyond dispute that windfarms require at least 90% backup from reliable controllable energy sources.

• National Grid data shows that windfarms cannot be relied upon to provide us with energy when we most need it. The cold weather of December/January 2009/10 illustrated this problem. With high pressure and a lack of wind only 0.2%, of a possible 5% of the UK's energy was generated by wind turbines during this time of greatest need.

Guest

#111

2014-07-25 14:18

Easy money maybe driving this, what could be simpler
take the money and walk away leaving the end to a historic airfield to memory. I hope enough support shows up to stop this erosion.

Guest

#112

2014-07-26 07:43

I have visited North Coats Flying club on a few occasions. It is a vibrant community of aviation enthusiasts who depend upon open country side for their operation. The position of the airfield was chosen by the MOD for this very reason. How can local planners allow new development in potentially dangerous locations to what was originally a government designated area? This should not be allowed to happen, it is morally wrong.

Guest

#113

2014-07-26 08:04

Alternative Energy is vitally important to the longevity of MAN! However, ground based activities like housing and farming are not exposed to the same risk as light aircraft would be by turbines. I fully support alternative energy but when planning consent has been in place so long for the runway/airfield how can a company be given permission to erect anything that could affect the airfields safe operation. It's not a case of "not in my back yard like" so many objections, this would be dangerous. Generally people who object to alternative energy from a "spoil the view" perspective should have their electricity cut off permanently. Good Luck North Coats.


Guest

#114

2014-07-27 22:08

North Coates has been an airfield for over 90 years and has a wartime record equal to that of the more celebrated RAF fields. Over the last two decades a small group of people have worked extremely hard to establish an airfield which is not only of great benefit to the general aviation movement but, by establishment of a museum documenting the airfield's history, is a focal point for the whole local community.

Guest

#115

2014-07-28 13:59

Remember places like North Coates are the reason we were not defeated in ww2 ,Do not destroy our history with something that will not be remembered .

Guest

#116

2014-07-28 15:13

Best of luck, keep up the good work

Guest

#117 North Coates - Proposed Wind FarmRe:

2014-07-28 23:07

If there is a case for a wind farm on this coast and it can't go off-shore then why not position it at Donna Nook which would not interfere with any other activity or residential interests?#1: -

 


Guest

#118

2014-07-28 23:56

I've been flying since 1977, in that time the aviation sites have always been targeted. Work together for a greener planet, better sites for wind power that benifit everyone not just the money hungry companies.

Guest

#119

2014-07-29 05:33

Good luck in saving the airfield!!!

Guest

#120

2014-07-29 12:20

Are wind profits more important than pilots lives? It would seem so to the Planning authorities. There are simple no-nos in aviation and one is tall structures on approach and climb out areas of runways. Truth is that weather can find people in situations outside their capability and the nearest airfield is sanctuary. Not so if surrounded by met masts and turbines.

Guest

#121

2014-07-29 16:40

I had my first flight from North Coates and it is an invaluable resource as an airfield, which must not be lost.

Guest

#122

2014-08-02 21:12

There are too many wind farms in East Yorkshire and now trying to ruin a good flying site like north coates

Guest

#123

2014-08-03 07:54

North Coates needs protecting as a flying site and not bullied by land grabbers such as wind farm developers

Guest

#124

2014-08-05 17:37

If there is a safe alternative?....the common sense dictates that it is used? Or are smart power not equipped with common sense.We need more Airfields and leisure places? Not less.

Guest

#125

2014-08-06 13:26

This plan seems bonkers.